Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:642Hits:20083653Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SHAMOA-NIR, LIPAZ (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   175472


Exposure to religious outgroup symbols and intergroup anxiety in Israel / Shamoa-Nir, Lipaz; Razpurker-Apfeld, Irene   Journal Article
Shamoa-Nir, Lipaz Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Israel is often at the centre of debate regarding religious diversity. We examined how exposure to religious symbols is associated with intergroup anxiety perceived from the Jewish majority among Arab minority groups. We found that outgroup and ingroup priming had different consequences for the two Arab groups: when primed with outgroup Jewish concepts, Arab-Muslim persons reported higher intergroup anxiety than Arab-Christian participants. However, when primed with ingroup concepts, the two minority groups did not differ significantly in intergroup anxiety experienced in interactions with Jews. Our results convey the importance of investigating why and when religious diversity may have a negative impact on intergroup relations.
        Export Export
2
ID:   154061


Window becomes a mirror: the use of the Johari Window model to evaluate stereotypes in intergroup dialogue in Israel / Shamoa-Nir, Lipaz   Journal Article
Shamoa-Nir, Lipaz Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This paper examines attitudes and stereotypes in intergroup dialogue (religious, secular) via the Johari Window model. Participants (N = 114) presented perceptions of the in-group and a data analysis revealed three prominent findings: (1) the presence of out-group members in the measuring of attitudes contributed to the moderation of stereotypes towards the in-group; (2) the measure of attitudes in the group setting and in conditions of numerical equality among groups intensified discrimination in favour of the in-group within the minority group; (3) presentation of attitudes on the in-group while being aware of the out-group members contributed to the process of defining identities. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in the understanding of the role of perceiving an identity, in the process of formation of stereotypes in the intergroup dialogue. From a practical viewpoint, a helpful tool is presented for the improvement of communication patterns in general and in dialogues among groups who are in conflict in particular.
        Export Export