| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
178221
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Rupa Publications India Pvt Ltd, 2021.
|
| Description |
x, 213p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789353339586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060005 | 891.44/MUK 060005 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
187099
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Rupa Publications India Pvt Ltd, 2021.
|
| Description |
x, 213p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789353339586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060235 | 954.14/MUK 060235 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
154591
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
163990
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
157620
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Does India regard the EU as a significant actor or prefers the bilateral approach towards individual member countries? Is it a dialectical relationship? How do India’s relations with the USA impact India-EU relations? Jean Luc Racine makes a cynical assessment about the EU-India-US triangular relationship. He acknowledges: “Some will deride Europe as a ‘bawdy old lady’, known for over 400 years, but with ‘no excitement, no passion’ left. The romance is with America, even if it is ‘tough love’, because the US was more open to migrants and is more prone to change the world.”
What adds complexity to this task is that conceptually India, post 1947, is regarded as a ‘modern state’, with the attributes of sovereignty, territoriality, and raison d’état (justification of sovereignty).In contrast, the EU is considered to be a ‘post modern intra state entity’ which does not emphasise sovereignty, the separation of domestic and foreign affairs, and which, after Schengen, increasingly regards borders as irrelevant. It is generally considered that the EU as a ‘post modern actor’ does not base its foreign policy on the balance of power and zero sum logic. There is no doubt that its inability to develop and implement a coherent and strong Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) has sent wrong signals to its strategic partners, including India.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
160793
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The emerging dynamics between President Trump, NATO and EU promises to constitute a fascinating new narrative of the changing contours of the international order in this millennium. President Trump has completely reversed American policy towards NATO.
As a businessman, Trump has made it clear that henceforth US funding and support would be linked to the US getting a ‘good deal’ from its NATO partners. NATO had earlier anchored itself to the benchmark goal that 2% of a country’s GDP should go to defence spending.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|