| Summary/Abstract |
The discipline of International Relations long has been identified and characterized as ‘American’ or ‘Anglo-American’.1 While recent work contests this assumption, either by giving a platform to different types of ‘regional IR’,2 or by bringing to light the interconnected colonial origins of the discipline,3 the discipline of International Relations remains dominated by US-based journals, scholars, and top-ranked programmes.4 The fact that all of this work is produced and carried out in the English language underpins and supports the US dominance in the field.
|