Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:583Hits:20279661Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CHINA’S PARTICIPATION (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   158035


China’s Participation in conflict resolution in the Middle East and North Africa: a case of quasi-mediation diplomacy? / Zoubir, Yahia; Sun, Degang   Journal Article
Sun, Degang Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Quasi-mediation diplomacy’ refers to the role a ‘mediating’ state plays in international activities to defend its commercial, political and diplomatic interests rather than core security and strategic interests. This type of mediator acts without seeking to dominate; to follow rather than to lead; to partake in the revision of the agenda rather than setting it; and, to encourage conflict de-escalation in lieu of determinedly engaging in conflict resolution. The dynamics of China’s quasi-mediation diplomacy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) depend on their relevance to China’s vital commercial interests, the scope of China’s influence, the level of the great powers’ consensus and the intractability of crisis settlement. Through a comprehensive interchange of the above-mentioned variables, China-styled quasi-mediation diplomacy rests on risk-aversion, revealing divergent forms which can be categorized at four levels, namely, multifaceted intervention, proactive involvement, limited intercession and indirect participation. These four categories of China’s quasi-mediation diplomacy shed light on China’s discreet participation in the MENA conflict resolutions.
        Export Export
2
ID:   175842


Proof of Greatness or Evidence of Modesty? a Comparative Analysis of China’s Participation in UN Peacekeeping Operations / Li, Quan ; Ye, Min   Journal Article
Li, Quan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Any serious discussion about the consequences of China’s rise must start with a systematic and rigorous assessment of China’s actual influence and status in the international system. In this article, we examine a widely used indicator in the debate about China’s international status. Although many existing studies see China’s active participation in United Nations (UN) Peacekeeping Operations as incontestable evidence of China’s great power status, others contend that it signifies the status of only a middle power. We posit that China’s policy behaviour should be evaluated in a comparative manner, and from a dynamic perspective. After comparing the patterns and features of China’s personnel contributions with that of 20 other major countries in the world, we find that China’s behaviour is more similar to that of developing ‘middle powers’, such as Turkey, India, and Brazil, as opposed to established ‘great powers’ such as other permanent members of the UN Security Council or traditional ‘western middle powers’.
        Export Export