Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1538Hits:18900643Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
HASSAN, MAI (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   185841


New Insights On Africa’s Autocratic Past / Hassan, Mai   Journal Article
Hassan, Mai Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract AFRICA HAS NOT BEEN IMMUNE to recent global trends in democratic backsliding. Although the vast majority of countries on the continent have been holding competitive multi-party elections since the end of the Cold War, we are currently witnessing attempts by elected presidents and ruling parties to extend their tenures through undemocratic means.1 These trends are concerning, not only for those seeing their rights and freedoms constrict, but because they are happening despite the presence of formal democratic institutions that are meant to curb the impulses of autocratic rule.
        Export Export
2
ID:   158209


Uneven accountability in the wake of political violence : evidence from Kenya’s ashes and archives / Hassan, Mai; O'Mealia, Thomas   Journal Article
Hassan, Mai Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The government faces a principal–agent problem with lower-level state officers. Officers are often expected to use the state coercive capacity endowed to them to politically benefit the government. But officers can shirk from the government’s demands. An officer’s actions during bouts of large-scale and highly visible electoral violence reveal the officer’s type, thereby providing the government with the information necessary to solve its principal–agent problem for the future. The government holds officers who used their authority to perpetuate incumbent-instigated violence accountable through positive rewards, while holding officers who used their authority to perpetuate opposition-instigated violence accountable through negative sanctions. We find evidence in support of the theory using micro-level archival data on 2,500 local officer appointments and fine-grained satellite data on the locations of violence in the aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 election. The Kenyan government was more likely to fire officials whose jurisdictions saw opposition-instigated violence that targeted government supporters. But we find the opposite result where violence was instigated by incumbent supporters: there, officers were less likely to be fired if violence occurred in their jurisdiction. Our results indicate that leaders can manipulate accountability processes after political violence to further politicize the state.
        Export Export