Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1538
Hits:18900643
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
HASSAN, MAI
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
185841
New Insights On Africa’s Autocratic Past
/ Hassan, Mai
Hassan, Mai
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
AFRICA HAS NOT BEEN IMMUNE to recent global trends in democratic backsliding. Although the vast majority of countries on the continent have been holding competitive multi-party elections since the end of the Cold War, we are currently witnessing attempts by elected presidents and ruling parties to extend their tenures through undemocratic means.1 These trends are concerning, not only for those seeing their rights and freedoms constrict, but because they are happening despite the presence of formal democratic institutions that are meant to curb the impulses of autocratic rule.
Key Words
Africa’s Autocratic Past
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
158209
Uneven accountability in the wake of political violence : evidence from Kenya’s ashes and archives
/ Hassan, Mai; O'Mealia, Thomas
Hassan, Mai
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
The government faces a principal–agent problem with lower-level state officers. Officers are often expected to use the state coercive capacity endowed to them to politically benefit the government. But officers can shirk from the government’s demands. An officer’s actions during bouts of large-scale and highly visible electoral violence reveal the officer’s type, thereby providing the government with the information necessary to solve its principal–agent problem for the future. The government holds officers who used their authority to perpetuate incumbent-instigated violence accountable through positive rewards, while holding officers who used their authority to perpetuate opposition-instigated violence accountable through negative sanctions. We find evidence in support of the theory using micro-level archival data on 2,500 local officer appointments and fine-grained satellite data on the locations of violence in the aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 election. The Kenyan government was more likely to fire officials whose jurisdictions saw opposition-instigated violence that targeted government supporters. But we find the opposite result where violence was instigated by incumbent supporters: there, officers were less likely to be fired if violence occurred in their jurisdiction. Our results indicate that leaders can manipulate accountability processes after political violence to further politicize the state.
Key Words
Bureaucracy
;
Africa
;
Ethnic Politics
;
State Violence
;
Electoral Violence
;
Coercive Apparatus
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export