| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
167135
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Can we continue to view European Integration as a project associated with conflict transformation and peacebuilding through the promotion of soft borders and cross-border cooperation? Or are we faced with yet another sign that the European Union (EU) has reached its limits? (Balibar 2015Balibar, É. 2015 November. Europe at the limits. Interventions 1–7. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2015.1106966.
[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]
; Bhambra 2015Bhambra, G. K. 2015 November. Whither Europe?: Postcolonial versus neocolonial cosmopolitanism. Interventions 1–16. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2015.1106964.
[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
158287
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article revisits the gendered implications of the Dayton peace settlement in Bosnia-Herzegovina and assesses possibilities for the meaningful integration of the Women, Peace and Security agenda into the consociational structures and post-conflict political agenda. This article outlines how the reification and legitimization of ethno-nationalist power over two decades of Dayton has restricted the terrain for gender activism. A critical assessment of post-Dayton governance reveals an unanticipated stratification of the agreement. International pressure for the stability of the peace settlement further constrains the complex task of addressing the gendered legacies of conflict and conflict transformation. In this context, local and international efforts to navigate Dayton's afterlives through gender activism act as a powerful reminder that Bosnia-Herzegovina's unfulfilled peace must remain a priority in research, activist and policymaking agendas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
167143
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
EU peacebuilding efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina have largely contributed to further cement stark geopolitical imaginaries that, on the one hand, crystallise belonging along exclusionary and fixed notions of ethnonational identity and, on the other, reify civilisational differences between the EU and the post-Yugoslav space. The kaleidoscopic lens of the borderscape opens opportunities to move beyond this impasse by highlighting alternative narratives and sites of border politics that are often overlooked in institutionalised approaches. At the interface between aesthetics, cultural politics and post-conflict transformations, the Sarajevo Film Festival provides a privileged vantage point to explore border negotiations and harness opportunities for conflict transformation through the medium of cinema.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|