Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:579Hits:20034106Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   158465


Alaska's conflicting objectives / Kendall-Miller, Heather ; Worl, Rosita Kaaháni   Journal Article
Heather Kendall-Miller Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The formal treaty-making period between the U.S. government and Native peoples ended in 1871, only four years after the United States purchased Alaska from Russia. As a result, Alaska Natives did not enter into treaties that recognized their political authority or land rights. Nor, following the end of the treaty-making period, were Alaska Natives granted the same land rights as federally recognized tribes in the lower forty-eight states. Rather, Congress created the Alaska Native Corporations as the management vehicle for conveyed lands in 1971. The unique legal status of these corporations has raised many questions about tribal land ownership and governance for future generations of Alaska Natives. Although Congress created the Native Corporations in its eagerness to settle land claims and assimilate Alaska Natives, Alaska Native cultures and governance structures persisted and evolved, and today many are reasserting the inherent authority of sovereign governments.
Key Words Alaska  Conflicting Objectives 
        Export Export