| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
159949
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Within the ambit of ‘Act East’, New Delhi’s determination to bring about significant, tangible changes as well as vigorously pursue a “proactive” foreign policy, has found its most significant extrapolation in the emphasis on boosting relations with major Indo-Pacific littoral powers like Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Australia, etc. In this context, the intensified engagement with regional maritime powers is a natural corollary of responding to the evolving strategic paradigm in the regional waters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
159948
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
During the past two decades, the impressive global emergence of India and discussion of its rightful place in the world is reverberating both within and beyond India. Prominent authors, statesmen, and critics have portrayed vividly India’s arrival on the world stage and the nation’s noble goal of peace and glory. Indian scholars like Shashi Tharoor in Pax Indica; C. Raja Mohan in Crossing the Rubicon; Bharat Karnad in Why India is Not a Great Power (Yet), etc. have fervently propagated India’s emergence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
159957
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Inspite of its drawbacks in various field of cooperation the relation between India and Japan has been considered to be more favorable and productive comparing to most of India’s immediate neighboring states. The steady tackling of its ups and downs since the beginning of India-Japan relation shows the growing political determination on both side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
159943
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
With the emerging convergence of similar views of both India and the US on many of the present grave crises viz. global terrorism and clandestine nuclear proliferation along with global economic recession and pollution of environment, there comes a ray of hope of a evolving new world order marked by the goals and ideals of India’s Foreign Policy and also that of NAM. Hence India should design a fine balance between the US and the NAM so that the stability, peace and progress of not only India or the US but that of the whole world may be ensured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
159961
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Indian relations with the world and its Foreign policy is today driven by Samman (respect) and Samriddhi (prosperity) to the country. Today India has need-based balanced foreign policy aligning with national interests in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
159952
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relations between Russia, China and India have widespread implications not only for bilateral relations among them, but also for the wider Indo- Pacific region. The China, Russia and India triangle heralds a situation where two sides, China and Russia, have grown much closer to each other, with India in danger of losing out in this process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
159942
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Bilateral Relationship between India and China When we speak of bilateral relationship between two countries, it should be kept in mind that every nation’s problems and prospects are significantly determined by history, heritage and its location on the globe. (Rowland,1967.) There is no denying the fact that bilateral relationship between two neighbouring countries are of great significance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
159958
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Terrorism in today’s age has become a major threat to the world including India and Russia. ISIS activity is an issue of great concern, cooperation between Russia and India is a necessity in contemporary world to counter such terrorist groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
159955
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relationships India and Russia to each other should be significantly revitalized with the force of new mechanisms or with the help of reorganized old ones, all working in for mutual benefit for setting a mark on worthwhile partnership. Also it is an essential mode of strengthening a strategic relationship which will showcase positive scope for improvement along with its every parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
159953
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Indian foreign policy has achieved significant success in the realm of international politics under the leadership of Narendra Modi in the last four years. Diplomatic efforts have been made to secure India’s geo-political, geo-economics and geo-strategic interests’ anywhere lie in the part of the world. In this duration, India’s Modi has struggled hard to maintain and develop foreign relations with the countries of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
159950
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Geopolitics is dynamic and countries respond to changes and continuities by adapting their foreign policy orientations. The Cold War period created structural constraints for India and the United States to align their interests, despite being fellow democracies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
159959
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A relation is a wide-ranging and multifaceted concept not only for the nations but also for onlookers.The nature of relations with other nationsmuch depends on national leaders, politicians, and non-governmental organizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
159954
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China–India relations, also called Sino-Indian relations or Indo-China relations, refers to the bilateral relationship between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of India. Historically, India and China have had relations for more than 2,000 years, but the modern relationship began in 1950 when India was among the first countries to end formal ties with the Republic of China (Taiwan) and recognize the PRC as the legitimate government of Mainland China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
159960
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A flawed Indian system of water cooperation with China would produce spill over effect in the other interest areas of the country. It would minimise the possibility of reducing the level of insecurity among the people in the NER as well as establishing Indian influence in its neighbourhood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
159946
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China and the United States of America are the two big powers of the world, shaping the new dimensions of global stability and security under the leadership of dynamic Xi Jinping and the daring Trump. China has the aspirations to catch up Chinese Dream on the other hand Trump is willing to restore American dream and make America great again. It will create controversy and conflict among each other particularly on security and economic issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
159947
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relationship between India and Russia was elevated to that of a Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership in 2010. The recent Summit in Sochi attempts to address the grievances of both the countries about the divergent national positions on international politics. The paper argues that only through consolidation of bilateral relations and addressing with each other’s apprehensions could be the way on building multipolar world order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
159945
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Indian foreign policy is facing a new challenge at a time of global flux. India has been engaging constructively with the West; put precisely the US and its allies Europe, Japan and Australia, at the cost of its ties with Russia and China. America’s relations with Russia and China are passing through the worst phase in the post-cold war world era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
159951
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India being a nascent modern nation state has pursued an independent foreign policy since its independence with a very active role in an idealist framework in World Affairs with a motto of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” (The world is one family) under the leadership role of first Prime Minister – Jawaharlal Nehru.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
159944
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping are leading the two most powerful nations in the world at a time when international system is witnessing a great strategic shift in the post cold war era. Though, both widely differ in their leadership styles, yet there is a limit for both of them to overcome the domestic and external structural constrains and conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
159956
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
An anatomy of geopolitics of the present world’s political order lies at the root of changing dynamic between traditional hegemon i.e. the Unites States of America and its challenger/s, China as well as its respective allies. What is in play is that while U.S and China follow and need each other, as much as its allies or its neighbouring countries, for both political and economic management of their foreign policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|