Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:354Hits:19892688Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
PEDERSEN, RASMUS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   193229


Small states shelter diplomacy: Balancing costs of entrapment and abandonment in the alliance dilemma / Pedersen, Rasmus   Journal Article
Pedersen, Rasmus Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Shelter theory has emerged as a promising but unrealized alternative to existing theories of bandwagon and hiding in the literature. It describes how small states can utilize the structural power of great powers to achieve political aims through the formation of asymmetric alliances. At present it is not clear exactly what shelter diplomacy aims to achieve, what type of costs it protects small states against and to what degree asymmetric shelters are useful when the preferences between the small state and the shelter partner widen. The article addresses these gaps. It develops a realist inspired model of shelter diplomacy that specifies when, how and with what effects small states can utilize the structural powers of great powers. It demonstrates how shelter diplomacy can help small states balance the costs of abandonment and entrapment in the alliance dilemma through construction of both asymmetric and symmetric shelters. The main contributions are to bring shelter diplomacy into the International Relations mainstream literature and develop a new theoretical middle position between the more well-described bandwagon and hiding strategies. The model is applied to a Danish case that demonstrates how small states have utilized and adopted dynamic shelter strategies in the European integration process.
Key Words Diplomacy  Realism  Denmark  Small State  Alliance Dilemma  Shelter Theory 
        Export Export
2
ID:   162433


Was something rotten in the state of Denmark? three narratives of the active internationalism in Danish foreign policy / Pedersen, Rasmus   Journal Article
Pedersen, Rasmus Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The Danish decision to enter US-led coalitions in Afghanistan and Iraq significantly consolidated and strengthened the Atlantic dimension in Danish foreign policy in the period 2001–2009. The period has attracted considerable academic interest, but there seems to be a lack of consensus about how to interpret the Danish decision, which has been characterised as everything from an indication of adaptation, to continuation of the Danish acquiescence to great powers, to path-breaking change in Danish foreign policy to an expression of small state independence. Part of the confusion in the literature is due to the lack of clear conceptual awareness regarding the concepts in use. This article identifies three frames in the literature and contributes to our understanding of the question of change and continuity in small state foreign and security policy by identifying the analytical implications of adopting a clearer understanding of analytical concepts such as adaptation, determinism, activism and internationalism in the Scandinavian context in general and the Danish context more specifically.
Key Words Internationalism  Denmark  Activism  Determinism  Adaptation  Foreign Policy 
        Export Export