|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
162988
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
US-Russia relations stand at a complicated juncture today. While Trump thinks he can get along with Putin, US Congress has a very different perception of Moscow. This contradiction shows up in the promulgation of US Congress’s Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which targets Russia and was signed into law by Trump last year despite his reservations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
162979
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
After India became independence in 1947, Jawaharlal Nehru remained the prime architecture who framed the foreign policy of India. However, after the demise of Nehru, the reins of the country went to the hands of different political leaders starting from Lal Bahadur Shastri (1965) to P.V. Narasimha Rao (1995) and finally the cudgel went to the hands of Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1998. When Atal Bihari Vajpayee came to power, he was faced severe challenges both internally and externally and from the very inception to the office as a Prime Minister, Vajpayee was engrossed with a manifold task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
162989
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India has become the rising super power in the world politics and so its nitration with the international community has special significance in the economic, social, cultural and political development of the nation. India’s involvement in the process of globalization was a calculated risk but today it has dipped in the depth of this new model of economic development. When we adopted Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization for the speedy development and to overcome the balance of payment crisis, we did not have any option except to adopt it and even present day India has the same compulsion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
162980
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
With the fast changing geo-political situation of the world, thanks to United States President Donald Trump, it is becoming very important to keep abreast with the latest updates. He has changed the world order and is acting like a big policeman or if I am allowed to say, I would call him a ‘Big Bully’. It is not even sure that by the time one reads this Article the situation may have again changed. US President Donald Trump has been challenging almost all the traditional assumptions about America’s international relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
162991
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In International power politics, the big question is aroused, in regard to how India will respond to the recent democratic triumph in India’s neighborhood especially in Pakistan and Maldives. Whether the answer is simply confined to customary routine practice and ritualistic gestures of congratulating and respecting the formality or much more? In this above backdrop, this paper has two objectives. First, it examines the latest development taking shape in Pakistan particularly after the victory of Imran Khan as a Prime Minister of Pakistan and what expectation has been made from India and how India responds to improve India-Pakistan relations. Second, it analyses Maldives recently concluded Presidential election and victory of Mr. Solih (a democratic candidate) and how India will respond to these development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
162997
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In order to fit Eurasia in its foreign policy, there is an imperative need for India to develop a feasible strategy in which Eurasian countries are given a special place to integrate. The New Great Game is slowly unfolding in the Eurasian region, with numerous approaches being applied by all major powers, and this is the time for India to showcase its potential. Nevertheless, changing geopolitical scenario in the Eurasian region still poses a big challenge to Indian foreign policy and will continue to impact Indian interests in the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
162987
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The SAARC has failed, and one of the main factors of its failure is the Indo-Pak conflict. Their ‘Cold War’ has infected it. They tend to view the programmes and activities of the SAARC from the point of view of their bilateral problems. Being engaged in a game of one-upmanship, they, quite often, neglect the interests and needs of the region. In the face of the ongoing conflict between the Big Two, the SAARC has failed to function efficiently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
163000
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The changing dynamics of Asia in recent times have had massive impact on foreign policy of countries world over. Both big and small powers alike have been facing challenges at domestic as well as international level as a result of these changes. Similarly, the growing aspirations of India’s 1.2 billion plus people and the shift of economic power from the West to East, India finds its strategic and economic interests intertwined with its neighbourhood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
162998
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The above-mentioned quote was said by the speaker at his state visit to Washington DC in 1969. This quote in the literal sense has no connection with this article. Although, it makes a compelling analogy of the geopolitical position of the United States in North America with India in South Asia. India, particularly in the case of its neighboring countries, has always had a complex and intertwined domestic policy and foreign policy. In terms of geographical size, economic advancement, and political stability, India has been the most powerful country in South Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
162986
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India has been recognized as one of the leading Indo-Pacific member nations given its vast economic potential, global diplomatic recognition, and powerful strategic rise. India has been also considered as the vital player to realize the much chanted Asian Century dream, however, the enduring Sino-India rivalry has been considered a negative attribute because China has been also the main player of such dream. At the same time, India’s evolving relationship with the US has been also worrying about China, Pakistan, and Russia. In this way, both China and Russia don’t like the US-dominated Indo-Pacific region and, hence, India while facing a dilemma like situation needs to play a balancing role amongst China and the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
162996
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India’s Nepal policy has been shaped by security interests, geographical factors, regional political changes, and past legacies. The concept of ‘Special relationship’ that was evolved by India through the mechanism of mutual security and foreign policy arrangements through the instrument of treaties failed in the changing political context of Nepal. Though India helped Nepal in political transformation the perceived interventionist behavior of India in the domestic affairs of Nepal has led to Indian foreign policy breakdown in the post-democratic transition period in Nepal. In this context, the paper will examine India’s policy towards Nepal and the reasons responsible for the breakdown of Indian policy in Nepal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
162992
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In fact, the geo-political importance of the Indian Ocean Region and the strategic location of Maldives provide huge opportunities for China, and consequently, pose severe challenges for India. Since the Modi government came into power in 2014, China is flexing its muscles to encircle New Delhi with the help of India’s neighbours, because Beijing’s main intension is to control India’s increasing influence in the region. Moreover, Maldives has been a close friend of India, however, during the Abdulla Yameen’s government; China has hugely invested in the small island nation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
162993
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Democracy, history, culture and economic and security benefits, prompt India and Myanmar to be good neighbours. Myanmar plays a vital role in India’s neighbourhood strategy due to its strategically positioned, close to its northeastern region and the Bay of Bengal. It has the potentiality to counter the China-Pakistan conspiracy in South Asia along with vital for maritime security and energy need. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s giving priority to neighbours through his twin policies of “Neighbourhood First” and “Act East” foreign policy strategy has become a subject of debate in South Asia, Southeast Asia and Asia-Pacific regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
162984
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Most newspapers and websites have commended the improvement which could be made possible owing to procedural reforms introduced by the Election Commission of Bhutan. It has been able to reignite the voter interest and arrest the further decline in voter turnout as the improvement in the election of National Council was repeated once again in the elections of National Assembly in 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
162981
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Seldom we find two countries in the annals of history whose relationship is bound by the depth of enormous cordiality as India and Russia. What began as a momentous journey of a merchant from the Russian city of Tver in 1466 remained etched in the sterling fundamentals it laid of bilateralism. Those were the years of a different India:Moghul empire was on its dying days. Vasco da Gama was yet to reach India only in 1498; the British empire was essaying to foray into Indian market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
162983
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Now the 5th year is approaching of PM Modi’s foreign policy. A number of changes were introduced in the domain of foreign policy; from first neighbourhood to a balancer in the world politics. It has a mixed bag. There are many successes and challenges. The emerging India-US multilayered strategic dialogue with the latest addition of 2+2 and at the same time US attempts to pressurise India on Iran issues have created a chasm between India and America. Indian Prime Minister reconfigured India-Russia relations in the light of emerging world politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
162995
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
For years, the common thread was the freedom struggle, with Mahatma Gandhi as a common inspirational link. Going forward, it is still important to unite against new attempts at exploitation, so they are not bullied into adopting unsustainable standards on issues like poverty alleviation or patents for generic drugs that India produces for Africa. It is this futuristic course that draws closer the ties between the African continent and the Indian subcontinent, described once by Nelson Mandela as ‘the golden thread woven in the common struggles against injustice and oppression’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
162999
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India’s immediate neighbourhood is of major consequence in foreign policy framework. China and Pakistan are two neighbourhood countries from which India faces constant security challenges. In the recent times, China’s exponential rise in terms of its military might, assertiveness in the Indo-pacific region, economic growth and its increased connectivity with India’s neighbourhood has alerted not only India but many countries world over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
162985
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In essence, the broad contours of 21st century Indian foreign policy have been propelled by introduction of substantial element of realism and pragmatism in its external relations. India is striving hard to continue enjoying strategic autonomy in shaping of its national interest at regional as well as global level. Development as an ideology has been retained. India today is fourth largest economy with approx. $3 Trillion GDP at the world level. As on date, it is the second fastest growing economy at the world level. The importance India’s foreign policy has received in last four hand a half years under Prime Minister Modi is visible from the very fact that Prime Minister himself has visited more than 54 countries in last 4.5 years after having formed the government in 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
162994
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Nuclear weapons play a significant role in the conduct of foreign policy. So far, the military impact of nuclear weapons has been studied which consist of the role of nuclear weapons in deterrence, compellence, coercion, and brinkmanship. However, insignificant efforts have been taken to study the non-military aspect of nuclear weapons. What has been often forgotten is that nuclear weapons are one of the important political tools which provide a technical, military and sometimes an economic advantage in the conduct of foreign policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|