| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
166468
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper employs a two-stage model to assess the consequences of an easy-to-use form of capacity payments in competitive electricity markets. We show that capacity payments increase capacity and expected consumer surplus, with little or no effect on expected social welfare (expected consumer surplus plus expected profits minus the cost of using capacity payments minus expected outage costs). In addition, we demonstrate that capacity payments can substantially reduce or, sometimes, fully eliminate electricity outage costs due to price capping or unexpected failure of some generation capacity. Thus, regulators should consider using this form of capacity payments since, in addition to their favorable effect on consumers and on social welfare, they mitigate the ‘missing money’ problem and increase system reliability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
169723
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Using reliability differentiation via tolling agreements with diverse heat rates and fuel types, we propose an efficient wholesale electricity market design under demand and supply uncertainty. Mainly based on North America's market experience, our proposed design adopts an independent system operator's (ISO's) existing practice of least-cost dispatch of heterogeneous generation units, real-time energy price determination and capacity rationing. It solves the missing money problem of inadequate incentive for thermal generation investment, without requiring the ISO to operate centralized capacity auctions, make capacity payments, set high energy price caps, or subsidize market entry. It preempts independent power producers' price manipulation in the ISO's real-time market for energy, thus easing the ISO's burden of market monitoring. It suggests two-part pricing of end-use consumption and power demand of a load serving entity's retail customers, thus meaningfully linking the wholesale and retail markets. It is applicable to countries that have implemented wholesale competition or are in the process of doing so. Hence, its policy implication is that it should be considered in the ongoing debate of electricity reliability and market competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|