Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:804
Hits:19060519
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
NAGEL, ROBERT ULRICH
(3)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
173130
Conflict-related Sexual Violence and Rebel Group Fragmentation
/ Nagel, Robert Ulrich; Doctor, Austin C
Nagel, Robert Ulrich
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
To what extent does sexual violence influence rebel group fragmentation? A substantial body of research explores wartime rape as a cohesion-building mechanism following forced recruitment. However, the relationship between sexual violence and broader organizational structural integrity has not been systematically tested. Our study on the effects of sexual violence on rebel group fragmentation provides this test. We argue that sexual violence increases cohesion at the battalion level but increases the risk of fragmentation of the broader organization because lieutenants are more likely to split from organizations if they are confident that their subordinate battalions are cohesive and will follow them. We test this argument on a global sample of 105 rebel organizations active between 1989 and 2014. The results provide robust support for the argument showing sexual violence increases the probability of fragmentation by a factor of six. This presents a crucial contribution to our understanding of sexual violence and rebel group fragmentation.
Key Words
Sexual Violence
;
Rebel Groups
;
Fragmentation
;
Cohesion
;
Civil War
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
178721
Gendered preferences: How women’s inclusion in society shapes negotiation occurrence in intrastate conflicts
/ Nagel, Robert Ulrich
Nagel, Robert Ulrich
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
To what extent do gender relations in society influence the likelihood of negotiations during intrastate disputes? A substantial body of literature recognizes gendered inequalities as integral to understanding conflict, yet they have received little attention in systematic studies of conflict management. I argue that patriarchal gender relations that reflect a preference for masculinity over femininity influence states’ propensity to negotiate with rebels. I draw on the concept of practices to explain how gender relations shape government preferences for negotiations. Specifically, I contend that practices of excluding women from fully participating in public life institutionalize violence as the preferred way of managing conflict. The implication is that countries with more patriarchal gender relations are less likely to engage in negotiations during intrastate conflicts. I test this argument on all civil conflict dyads between 1975 and 2014. The analyses show that countries that marginalize women’s participation in public life are significantly less likely to engage in negotiations. The results provide strong support for my theoretical argument and offer systematic evidence in support of core claims of the feminist peace theory.
Key Words
Conflict
;
Negotiation
;
Gender Inequality
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
3
ID:
168277
Talking to the Shameless?: Sexual Violence and Mediation in Intrastate Conflicts
/ Nagel, Robert Ulrich
Nagel, Robert Ulrich
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
To what extent, does sexual violence influence the likelihood of conflict management in intrastate conflicts? Despite a growing body of research that explores conflict-related sexual violence, the literature presents little insight on its effects on conflict resolution. Extending feminist international relations (IR) theory to intrastate conflicts and applying a gender lens to the power to hurt argument, I argue that when rebel sexual violence is public knowledge, the likelihood of conflict management increases because the state perceives it as a threat to its masculinity. I systematically test this argument on all intrastate conflict years from 1990 to 2009 using the Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict and the Civil War Mediation data set. The results provide robust support for the argument. This presents an important refinement of traditional rationalist conflict bargaining theories and opens new avenues for the research and practice of conflict management.
Key Words
Conflict Management
;
Civil Wars
;
Mediation
;
Gender
;
Sexual Violence
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export