Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2353Hits:21262379Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SSEREMBA, YAHYA (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   175525


Ethnic emancipation and conflict escalation in Uganda / Sseremba, Yahya   Journal Article
Sseremba, Yahya Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article examines why the emancipation of ethnic groups has failed to address ethnic conflicts in Uganda. Successive Ugandan governments, especially the current regime of President Yoweri Museveni, have attempted to end the country’s history of ethnic strife by creating separate constituencies, separate districts and separate kingdoms for marginalised ethnic groups to free them from the domination of powerful ethnic groups. Focussing on the Rwenzori area of western Uganda where ethnic violence is severest, I show how the approach of ethnic emancipation reproduces ethnicity as the basis for political inclusion and escalates rather than abates ethnic contestations. This study should shed more light on the challenge of ethnic federalism in other countries like Ethiopia and Nigeria.
        Export Export
2
ID:   168845


Making and Remaking of “Native Tribes” in Uganda’s Toro Kingdom / Sseremba, Yahya   Journal Article
Sseremba, Yahya Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract When the Rwenzururu Movement realized that the Bakonzo and Bamba suffered discrimination in Toro because the law did not define them as “native tribes” of Toro, it demanded that the law should be amended to redefine the category “native of Toro” from one ethnic group—Batoro—to three—Batoro, Bakonzo, and Bamba. By calling for the reconstitution of “native of Toro” to recognize three ethnic groups instead of questioning ethnicity itself as the basis for inclusion, the Rwenzururu sought to reproduce the politicization of ethnicity that had led to ethnic discrimination in the first place. Showing that this response was a replica of the “tribalism” of the colonial-created Toro Native Authority, I examine how the colonial state and resistance movements like the Rwenzururu reinforced each other in sustaining ethnicity as a divisive political identity. Instead of analyzing the initiative of African “indigenous intellectuals” in isolation from the colonial state, as recent studies seem to have done, I bring the two actors together and show the meeting point of the different processes of the tribalization of African societies.
        Export Export