Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:563Hits:20302871Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BOGDANOV, KONSTANTIN V (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   169566


Flexible Coalitions: Origins and Prospects : Permanent alliances vs ad h oc Coalitions / Bogdanov, Konstantin V   Journal Article
Konstantin V. Bogdanov Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The beginning of the 21st century was marked by the growing popularity of the idea that flexible military-political coalitions built for concrete tactical tasks had certain advantages over long-term strategic alliances. This strategy was actively pursued on the international stage by the George W. Bush administration during its first term (largely owing to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s efforts) due to mounting contradictions caused by the transformation of the world order and the changing place and role of the United States in it. The U.S. gave up the concept of collective approval for external interference and stepped up unilateral actions. As existing collective security institutions become increasingly plagued with problems, flexible coalition strategies gain more popularity as evidenced not only by U.S. actions but also by those of Russia
        Export Export
2
ID:   180794


Hybrid Matryoshka and a Monastery : Arms Control in the Era of Turbulence / Bogdanov, Konstantin V   Journal Article
Bogdanov, Konstantin V Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The post-bipolar world order, transitional in nature, lacks an established set of institutional norms and rules that would provide a place for arms control in the general system of international security. Many aspects of the world order that directly affect the arms control architecture have already changed, and this factor largely destructs existing arms control regimes. With the current world order in transition, which combines elements of the old order and new factors and interdependencies, it would be reasonable to take a hybrid approach to arms control where a well-structured and legally binding core addressing nuclear risks would be accompanied by flexible application of more liberal formats, making it possible to strengthen and develop periphery areas that were previously not covered by the relevant rules or lost them due to the cancellation of relevant agreements.
        Export Export