| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
170602
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article attempts to analyze the current political situation in Libya through the activities of the main actors and a net of opportunistic interactions they create on the national and international levels. The paper scrutinizes Libya’s three governments and the tribal factor, and also considers the role of neocons who have recently entered the political milieu and claim their stakes in the future of the country. An attempt is made to look at international relations theories, specifically the realist conception and the liberal interdependence narrative, and their holistic approach to the state, through the lens of their applicability to the Libyan case, in order to understand the Libyan puzzle and forecast its future development. The study also includes an analysis of the diversity of national and international centers of power in Libya, including existing tribes and clans, and their involvement in the crisis. An effort is made to formulate relevant arguments for future debate, which, in our opinion, is inevitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
180790
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
During the short period of Donald Trump’s presidency, U.S. foreign policy
underwent significant changes. The visible decline in the activity in the
southern and south-eastern Mediterranean in previous years gave way
to Washington’s increased diplomatic activity in the settlement process.
Although the lion’s share of U.S. foreign policy in the MENA region was
aimed at resolving the Arab-Israel confrontation, it did not ignore local
conflicts such as the Libyan crisis, which at first glance has little to do
with the main goals of the U.S. policy the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|