| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
182268
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Both New Zealand and Australia have flourishing space industries and in both government intervention is important in their development. Although the two countries have similar political economies, they intervene in different fashion. In New Zealand the focus is more on facilitating the activity of market actors, but in Australia there is more emphasis on guiding space development. Whereas New Zealand, for instance, seeks to reduce regulatory burdens, Australia focuses on financing business segments in the industry that it wants to grow. That business-government relations in the two countries differ may be one explanation for this contrasting approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
182059
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
To develop their space sectors, Taiwan’s and South Korea’s space agencies
intervene differently. This is despite the developmental state literature indicating that the agencies’ ideologies, mechanisms, and preferences will be
similar. This article recounts the literature’s expectations about the two agencies.
It then reviews what the two agencies are actually doing to develop their space
sectors. This article ends by discussing the implications of the two agencies’ differences for stakeholders in Taiwan’s and South Korea’s space sectors and identifying
questions to guide future research that builds off this article’s findings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
172661
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article seeks to highlight how New Zealand’s and Australia’s space sectors are more different than they appear. Emphasizing differences builds a nuanced perspective about how the two space sectors have grown and will likely continue to grow. Such a perspective benefits individuals interested in the two countries’ space sectors—it helps government bureaucrats devise policy, firms decide business strategy, and investors place their capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|