| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
011567
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 1997.
|
| Description |
1581-1583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
063736
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
015563
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
012160
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aug 1997.
|
| Description |
687-697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
012478
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Sept 1997.
|
| Description |
913-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
012687
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 1997.
|
| Description |
1058-74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
058290
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
016309
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jun 1993.
|
| Description |
251-263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
018204
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 2000.
|
| Description |
1725-1744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
063860
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
077437
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Both India and Japan have evinced interest in deploying defences against ballistic missiles because of the threat they pose. Significantly, both have shifted their stance on US Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD), from previous opposition to active support. Notwithstanding certain basic differences between India and Japan on the nature and degree of interest and participation at present, shared interests offer an opportunity for them to cooperate with each other on the BMD issue to further consolidate the 'strategic partnership' understanding they have evolved. Since Japan is already actively collaborating with the United States in not only deploying BMDs but also co-developing certain critical components, and India actively weighing various options, including cooperation with the United States, in this field, it may become imperative for India and Japan to cooperate once India takes a firm decision on BMD deployment. Apart from common concerns about proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and missiles, in particular the clandestine deals between North Korea and Pakistan, the strategic relations between the two countries have so far been focused on the maritime cooperation. Joint work on missile defence could become a new dimension of bilateral relationship and help co-development of advanced technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
063949
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
ID:
066171
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 2005.
|
| Description |
xxvi, 648p.
|
| Standard Number |
8186019529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050223 | 327.952/SIS 050223 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 050224 | 327.952/SIS 050224 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
063753
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
063722
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
147977
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Dominance of the South China Sea is not merely a territorial issue for China but, more importantly, one which it regards as a major step towards recognition as an unrivalled Asia-Pacific power that can arbitrate on global and regional issues along with the US. Since the 18th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and appointment of Xi Jinping simultaneously to China’s three top posts in November 2012, the world is witness to a new thrust to China’s already assertive foreign policy. Early in Xi Jinping’s term, China launched major, bold, geo-strategic initiatives aimed at expanding China’s diplomatic and economic influence and military power well beyond its frontiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
063865
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
063845
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
058551
|
|
|