Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:458Hits:20798173Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
YOUSEF, HODA A (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   188165


Other Legacy of Qasim Amin: the View from 1908 / Yousef, Hoda A   Journal Article
Yousef, Hoda A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In Egyptian popular history and culture, Qasim Amin is often referred to the “father of feminism” or the “liberator of women.” However, this was not always the case. Upon his death in 1908, a different legacy emerged in many early eulogies, speeches, biographical sketches, and commemorations of Amin's life. In this early framing of Amin's legacy, his two most famous books were celebrated in ways that minimized the “woman question” while highlighting other aspects of his reforms and work. This allowed Amin's 1908 contemporaries to overlook the divisiveness of his earlier positions in favor of a new sort of fraternal solidarity—one that served the interests of certain political and intellectual male elites. For many of these writers—with a few notable exceptions—Amin was a quintessential reformer and thinker whose interest in the status of women was important insofar as it spoke to the ethos of his intellectual and political projects, not what it could do for women.
Key Words Biography  Memory  Commemoration  Nahda  eulogy  Egyptian feminism 
        Export Export
2
ID:   173357


Pleading for a place in modern Egypt: negotiating poverty and patriarchy, 1908–1913 / Yousef, Hoda A   Journal Article
Yousef, Hoda A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This paper examines the petitions of a poor woman, Jalila Saʿd, who sought educational opportunities and property from the Egyptian government between 1908 and 1913. Her interest in procuring a ‘place’ for her sons and her family in modernizing Egypt reflects the ways in which non-elites were able to participate in and move within the major physical and discursive public spaces of the era. This study argues that even those at the very edges of society were not categorically marginalized; rather, they were negotiating the dominant spatial hierarchies of their time in attempts to better their circumstances. This ability to navigate and participate in the prevailing discussions and institutions of the time demonstrates that even the most marginalized elements of Egyptian society were quite integrated into the project of ‘modern Egypt’, even if they did not always reap its benefits.
        Export Export