| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
015217
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1992.
|
| Description |
343-351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
014968
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 92-Jan 93.
|
| Description |
17-19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
123172
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Abstract This article explores the attitudes of Canadian officials towards international conflict mediation and towards the potential for greater official Canadian involvement in the field. The study is based on extensive interviews with Canadian officials who have been involved in mediation at various points over a 20-year period. It finds that Canada, and particularly the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), has taken a largely ad hoc approach to its involvement in the field. Prior to the initiation of this study, there had been no attempt to develop an institutional capacity in this field within DFAIT or to keep track of the personnel involved in such experiences, much less to develop a trained cadre of such individuals. This stands in contrast to the efforts of countries that have prioritized mediation as a foreign policy activity, such as some Scandinavian countries and Switzerland. Many of those interviewed pointed to these countries as potential models for Canada in this field, but it became apparent in discussions that most of those interviewees were not necessarily well-informed as to what these countries have done; there was just a general sense that these countries do it well and that Canada could learn from them. Moreover, none of the interviewees demonstrated significant familiarity with the vast literature on mediation. Those interviewed made recommendations as to how Canada might develop its official mediation capacities so as to play a more active and focused role in this field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
005045
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
2nd Edition
|
| Publication |
New York, St.Martin's pr., 1994.
|
| Description |
x, 260p.
|
| Standard Number |
0312049064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036068 | 355.027/BRO 036068 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
151895
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Nuclear arms control needs a new paradigm. The current approach, focused on deployed strategic nuclear “delivery vehicles”—long-range bombers, nuclear ballistic missile submarines, and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), together often referenced as the nuclear triad—was forged during a Cold War standoff between two heavily armed superpower rivals, the United States and the Soviet Union.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
063433
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
005508
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, United Nations, 1995.
|
| Description |
xv,230p.
|
| Standard Number |
9290450975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036859 | 355.03304/GHE 036859 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
081309
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In September 1991, U.S. President George H.W. Bush launched the Presidential Nuclear Initiatives (PNIs), which were unilateral measures that led to the largest reductions in the American and Soviet/Russian nuclear arsenals to date. Despite their eventual success, the United States took on significant risks in launching the PNIs. To uncover the best theoretical explanation for their onset, this article uses realism, neorealism, the bureaucratic politics model, expected utility theory, and prospect theory to generate ex ante predictions regarding nuclear arms control at the end of the Cold War. It then tests the theories' predictions against the empirical record. The results suggest that a focus on an individual decision maker-President Bush-is necessary to fully understand the PNIs and that an explanation rooted in prospect theory offers the most explanatory power. This study speaks to an important debate in discipline regarding the significance of individuals, while underscoring the value of exploring foreign policy decision making from multiple levels of analysis. It also advances the literatures on risk acceptance and prospect theory by shifting their applications away from militarized conflict and crises to diplomatic negotiations and cooperation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
005573
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991.
|
| Description |
x,297p.
|
| Standard Number |
0792314018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034284 | 341.7/MCW 034284 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
004995
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Geneva, Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, 1994.
|
| Description |
110p.
|
| Series |
PSIS Occasional paper; no.2/1994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036103 | 327.174/MEI 036103 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
146811
|
|
|
|
|
| Contents |
Amid tensions with the West over Ukraine, Russia pulled out of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe in March 2015. The Russian case is another example of a country disengaging from conventional arms control when relations with other member states deteriorate. This raises an important question: can arms control regimes aimed at preventing conflict survive periods of tension and preserve peace? This article argues no. It demonstrates that the prospect and stability of conventional arms control regimes depend on healthy international relations. In times of tension, governments rely on military institutions for advice and absorb military biases incompatible with arms control. Therefore, these regimes fail when most needed and are impotent as instruments of peace. Beyond conventional arms control, the article hints at the fragility of nuclear agreements such as the 2015 Iran deal and the 2010 New START between the United States and Russia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
035838
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, The International Institute for strategic studies., 1972.
|
| Description |
viii, 96p.pbk
|
| Contents |
Acc. No. 009806 (Include in this Volume) : 1972-1973
Acc. No. 011975 (Include in this Volume) : 1973-1974
Acc. No. 013889 (Include in this Volume) : 1974-1975
Acc. No. 015108 (Include in this Volume) : 1975-1976
Acc. No. 015869 (Include in this Volume) : 1976-1977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 009806 | 355.03/IIS 009806 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
152705
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1984.
|
| Description |
viii, 159p.; viii, 199ppbk
|
| Contents |
Acc. No. 024610 (Include in this Volume) : 1984-1985
Acc. No. 025895 (Include in this Volume) : 1985-1986
|
| Standard Number |
0860790835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034177 | 355.03/IIS 034177 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
035761
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1984.
|
| Description |
viii, 159p.; viii, 199p.pbk
|
| Contents |
Acc. No. 024610 (Include in this Volume) : 1984-1985
Acc. No. 025895 (Include in this Volume) : 1985-1986
|
| Standard Number |
0860790835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024610 | 355.03/IIS 024610 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
035790
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1988.
|
| Description |
262p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0860791491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 029691 | 355.03/IIS 029691 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
035810
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1988.
|
| Description |
260p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0860791491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 029690 | 355.03/IIS 029690 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
144660
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, IISS, 1988.
|
| Description |
260p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0860791491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 035520 | 355.03/IIS 035520 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
000473
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Lancers, 1999.
|
| Description |
xx, 388p.
|
| Standard Number |
8170950708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 041835 | 320.540947/SHA 041835 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
104799
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
104633
|
|
|