Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1365Hits:18882631Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
HASELSWERDT, JAKE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   175281


Carving Out: Isolating the True Effect of Self-Interest on Policy Attitudes / Haselswerdt, Jake   Journal Article
HASELSWERDT, JAKE Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract How important is self-interest in people’s opinions about public policy? If a policy proposal exempts a subset of the target group from costs that others will have to pay, or denies them benefits that others will enjoy, do they respond according to self-interest? This experimental study distinguishes between true self-interest and affinity for one’s in-group by exploiting a common feature of policy proposals: age-based “carve-outs” that prevent otherwise similar subgroups of a population from being affected by the benefits or burdens of a new policy (e.g., cuts to an old-age program that exempt people above a certain age). I find self-interest effects for older Americans exempt from cuts to Medicare and younger people too old to benefit from a hypothetical student debt relief program. These effects vary in ways that are consistent with extant theory.
        Export Export
2
ID:   178978


Social Welfare Attitudes and Immigrants as a Target Population: experimental evidence / Haselswerdt, Jake   Journal Article
HASELSWERDT, JAKE Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract What makes some Americans assume that social welfare programs will benefit immigrants rather than native-born Americans? How do these assumptions shape their attitudes about policy? Recent observational research has shown that immigration attitudes and social welfare attitudes are strongly correlated, but we lack evidence of exactly how this relationship works. In this pre-registered survey experiment, I study respondents’ assumptions about beneficiaries of a generic social welfare policy, and test the effects of different “threat” primes on the assumption that the policy benefits immigrants rather than native-born Americans. I find that a prime constructing immigrants as a fiscal threat increases the likelihood that a respondent will make this assumption, while a prime emphasizing cultural or demographic threat has no significant effect. These effects vary by geographic context, but not by relevant attitudes. Attitudes about immigration become an important predictor of policy approval when this assumption is triggered.
        Export Export