Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1515Hits:19693017Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GABAY, NADAV (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   187566


Effect of news media political bias on pre-elections poll results: evidence from the 2019–20 Israeli elections / Gabay, Nadav   Journal Article
Gabay, Nadav Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Research has had very little to say about whether polling predictions of elections outcomes are biased in line with the political bias of the news outlets that commission the polls. This article examines the relationship between news media political bias and bias in the published results of media-sponsored pre-elections polls in the three Israeli elections that took place in 2019–20. Given that these elections were largely referenda on Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption charges – dividing the political system, the media, and the Israeli public into pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu camps – media political biases are narrowly defined in accordance with news outlets’ general attitudes to the charges. Thus, polling bias is defined as a systematic overestimate or underestimate of the number of parliamentary seats that the bloc of pro-Netanyahu parties will actually receive. It is found that, on average, polls commissioned by anti-Netanyahu media consistently underestimated the number of seats that the pro-Netanyahu bloc would win.
        Export Export
2
ID:   175469


Legitimation crises, public inquiries and boundary construction: the Or Commission and the Green Line paradox / Gabay, Nadav   Journal Article
Gabay, Nadav Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article examines the Or Commission of Inquiry and the discursive invention of the ‘October 2000 disturbances’ by offering a reconceptualisation of the Green Line function in the context of the Israeli state ideology (mamlachtiut). The commission presents an interesting case of a State Commission of Inquiry working under unprecedented lack of public and political legitimacy and of government support. By applying a sociopolitical perspective, the article analyzes the Or Commission not simply as a neutral administrative instrument but as a political actor that sought to enhance its legitimacy and influence public opinion and decision-makers by deviating considerably from its official mandate.
        Export Export