Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:786Hits:20017888Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
HENÅKER, LARS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   188364


Decision-making style and victory in battle—Is there a relation? / Henåker, Lars   Journal Article
Henåker, Lars Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Can decision-making styles impact victory and defeat in armed conflicts? To answer the question of whether decision-making styles are linked to the victories and defeats of individual tacticians, this study utilizes five general decision-making styles: Rational, Intuitive, Dependent, Avoidant and Spontaneous. The aim of this study is to examine whether one or several of the general decision-making styles (GDMS) have an impact on tactical outcomes in wargames. A total of 104 officers and academics participated in the study. The study’s foremost conclusion is that the Dependent style is significantly connected to defeat in the wargame’s dueling set up.
        Export Export
2
ID:   175697


Tentative model on effective army combat tactics / Thunholm, Peter; Henåker, Lars   Journal Article
Thunholm, Peter Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The purpose of this study is to form a model on effective tactics. We selected five theorists, three of which also provided support from quantitative analysis on winning battles. The theorists all advocate the use of maneuver warfare, developed from the German WWII-approach. The analysis indicates the importance of accomplishing a sequence in battle of surprise attacks, followed by shock action, and prompt exploitation in order to accomplish an organizational breakdown of enemy force. Tactical defeat is foremost a result of psychological reactions by the enemy rather than from physical destruction by superior material resources at the point of assault.
        Export Export