Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:786
Hits:20017888
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
HENÅKER, LARS
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
188364
Decision-making style and victory in battle—Is there a relation?
/ Henåker, Lars
Henåker, Lars
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Can decision-making styles impact victory and defeat in armed conflicts? To answer the question of whether decision-making styles are linked to the victories and defeats of individual tacticians, this study utilizes five general decision-making styles: Rational, Intuitive, Dependent, Avoidant and Spontaneous. The aim of this study is to examine whether one or several of the general decision-making styles (GDMS) have an impact on tactical outcomes in wargames. A total of 104 officers and academics participated in the study. The study’s foremost conclusion is that the Dependent style is significantly connected to defeat in the wargame’s dueling set up.
Key Words
general decision-making styles (GDMS)
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
175697
Tentative model on effective army combat tactics
/ Thunholm, Peter; Henåker, Lars
Thunholm, Peter
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
The purpose of this study is to form a model on effective tactics. We selected five theorists, three of which also provided support from quantitative analysis on winning battles. The theorists all advocate the use of maneuver warfare, developed from the German WWII-approach. The analysis indicates the importance of accomplishing a sequence in battle of surprise attacks, followed by shock action, and prompt exploitation in order to accomplish an organizational breakdown of enemy force. Tactical defeat is foremost a result of psychological reactions by the enemy rather than from physical destruction by superior material resources at the point of assault.
Key Words
Tentative Model
;
Army Combat Tactics
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export