|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
175941
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The principles of shaping and implementing China's energy policy have undergone significant changes since the early 2000s, due to China's increasing geopolitical role in the world and its becoming the largest importer of primary energy resources, crude oil and natural gas. The adaptation of Japan's experience has played a significant role in this process - the stages of development that Japan's energy policy had previously undergone are undoubtedly repeated now in China. The similarity of the economies, their export-oriented nature, and the lack of their own fossil fuels have manifested themselves. The analysis and assessment of the peculiarities of China's energy policy development, complemented by Japanese experience, will make it possible to explore the topic of this article more fully, without focusing solely on domesticl Chinese problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
175938
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Expanding and strengthening its role and place in global governance has become one of the important directions of foreign policy activities of present-day China (PRC) with its increased significant financial and economic power and ambitions in the international arena.
The article highlights and characterizes the main stages of China's involvement in global governance in the past 70 years since the founding of the PRC, analyzing China's engagement in global economic and security governance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
175945
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article deals with works by some Western Sinologists about China in the era of Xi Jinping. The Western media and academic community have collected a large amount of factual material about modern China, including China in the "Xi Jinping era." However, Western academic science has not created a research paradigm that would comprehensively explain the system of Chinese socialism. In the author's opinion, the basic concept of "authoritarian resilience" is, to a certain extent, contradictory in itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
175942
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The fuel and energy sector (FES) plays an important role in modern international relations. One of the examples of active cooperation in the FES in the early 21st century is the dialogue between China and Great Britain, which is based on an extensive system of agreements and joint projects. The authorities of the states render assistance to national fuel and energy companies in drawing up the contours of the energy alliance. At the same time, the Chinese side, using its accumulated potential, plays an increasingly important role in bilateral relations, acting as a major buyer of energy resources, a donor of modern technologies, and a promising investor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
175944
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper concerns the process of Russia's Far East transportation system development since the middle of the 17th century in the context of economic development of the region. The classification presented by the author includes thirteen stages of the transportation system development, taking into account the general economic goals, economic needs, and the scale of foreign economic interactions. The classification marks three stages of decline due to political events, limited economic resources, and structural reform, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
175946
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article deals with the current state of the process of humanitarian interaction between Russia and China. The humanitarian ties of the two countries, enriched with new content, are multifaceted and complex. The important component of comprehensive strategic partnership between Russia and China is cooperation between regions of the two countries. The author draws the conclusion that humanitarian ties between RF and PRC at all levels and in various areas give a powerful impetus to the further development of relations between the two countries adapting to the needs of the new era and strengthening mutual understanding between their peoples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
175937
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper is concerned with the complex problems in relations between Japan and South Korea, rooted in the colonial rule of Japan on the Korean Peninsula. These include the territorial dispute over a group of islets in the Sea of Japan, the issue of Korean "comfort women," Seoul's claim to rename the Sea of Japan as the East Sea, the claim for compensation for Koreans who were mobilized for hard work in Japanese companies during the war, and others. We conclude that growing tensions in ties between Japan and South Korea are weakening the Japan-US-South Korea military-political alliance triangle, which could lead to a change in the balance of power in Northeast Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
175936
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Against the background of a protracted and arduous war on the coronavirus pandemic, the experience of countries that were able either to keep the virus out or to handle the problem with relatively few cases and deaths draws attention. In this context, both the DPRK and RoK are interesting examples, whose experiences, including comparative ones, are worth a more careful look. In both countries, the control of coronavirus has proven to be a political issue, and therefore these states have invested as much as possible in solving the problem, using all means of control according to the available technological level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
175939
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article analyzes relations between the leading world powers (the United States, China, and Russia) with respect to problems of global and regional security, along with the American and Chinese approaches to them. Prospects for creating a military and political alliance between Russia and China are considered as well. The author identifies possible ways of resolving the considered problems in the context of a Russia-China-US "strategic triangle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
175940
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article deals with the main directions of policy pursued by People's Republic of China in Southeast Asia (SEA). Political, trade, economic, cultural and educational measures of China to strengthen its influence in Southeast Asia are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the organization of trade and economic cooperation and ensuring the regional security of China together with the SEA countries. We also consider the problem of the South China Sea in relations between China and ASEAN countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
175943
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since 2012, Russia is accelerating the pace of the Far East development. Preferential regimes for attracting investments, such as Priority Development Area (PDA), The Free Port of Vladivostok, etc. were developed and launched. At the same time, the Northeast Asian countries put forward a number of new state strategies in the sphere of international cooperation: The One Belt, One Road initiative, the New Northern Policy, the Nine Bridges, and the Eight-Point Cooperation Plan. The interlocking of these strategies gave a new impetus to the priority development of the Russian Far East.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|