| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
179600
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The involvement of states in India’s foreign policy-making could be vital in launching India onto the next phase of development. The centre holds executive power in all matters related to foreign policy as stipulated in Article 246a, 7th schedule. Indian states already have many responsibilities like improving infrastructure for public health services, agriculture, transportation, etc. However, there is a heightened need to improve their economic performance and generate enough revenue so as to not depend on the centre for funding and help improve foreign relations with other nation-states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
179607
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Traditionally, India has been an agrarian economy; however, over the last thirty years, there has been a transition in the contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)- with service sector leading from the front. Moreover, Indian emigrants have been playing a massive role for decades in the country’s Growth and Social Development through remittances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
179606
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Before independence, British Indian Foreign Policy was more like a mirror image of British Foreign policy whose prime interest was to safe guard interests of British Empire than Indian interests. Although, India was one of the biggest colonies and leading source of raw materials, and market for the finished British goods, it never got its deserved priority from the British. Also, India was considered a main source of manpower for production and defence forces, but its interests were never addressed in the British Indian Foreign Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
179605
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Foreign Policy basically consists of those principles and objectives that guide both bilateral and multilateral relations of a country with other in the world of politics. These principles and objectives take their shape from the national interest and priorities of the particular country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
179594
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The visit of Russian foreign minister Mr Sergei Lavrov to India in the first week of April 2021 is a landmark event not only to strengthen bilateral ties between India and Russia, but also to sustain cooperation on regional and global issues. This is evident from the fact that the latest meeting of Lavrov with India’s foreign minister Mr. Jaishankar in New Delhi covered wide range of political, economic, security related issues concerning both the countries in the context of global political changes and Covid Pandemic to rebalance international relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
179601
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Diplomacy has been one of the finest instrument to achieve the goals of foreign policy of a country . Traditionally, sovereign state actors have used this tool in an exclusive way in order to protect national interests. Subsequently, the day came when Chief architects of national interests of a country felt that preserving national interests , ensuring national security , protecting territorial integrity and sovereignty of the country and economic growth and development is neither an exclusive right nor exclusive amenibility of a specific entity engaged in effective execution of foreign policy .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
179597
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Paradiplomacy is another name for the role of states or constituent units in the foreign policy. Para diplomacy has assumed a special significance in the post-globalized world, which facilitates the participation of states or constituent units of a nation in the formulation and implementation of foreign affairs. This underlines the changing nature of foreign policy process as well its environment. The Foreign Policy of nation is neither conceived nor functions in a vacuum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
179604
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Northeast India is gateway to stability , prosperity and cordial relations with India’s neighbourhood . The geographical position of North East Indian states give them prime importance in ensuring India’s multi-layered security especially energy security and distinct ethnic cultural identity of india. That is why Indian Prime Minister Prime Minister had said during inauguration of Bhupen Hazarika Bridge in May , 2017 that The Central Govt is building infrastructure to make North East India an important business hub under India’s Act East Policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
179602
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Most studies focus on the role of the sub-regional states in influencing India’s foreign policy towards other sovereign nations. This paper specifically discusses the role of the historical and cultural relations in influencing the foreign policy of Indonesia towards India. In this empirical piece we have contextualised the Odisha case to argue that Odisha’s influence is significant in the durable unhindered cordial relations between both the nations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
179596
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
What makes us human beings? What makes us sovereign within ourselves? What gives value to our existence? What gives us the power to think and act? We believe without this capacity we will be reduced to just living beings. What is the factor that makes living beings into human beings? The immediate answer would be freedom. Freedom or liberty is the most important of all essential normative ingredients that make up the modern society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
179599
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Every sovereign country fancy to have independent foreign policy inclined to none. But the fact is that it inclines to one or the other great powers such as USA, Russia or China. Making of foreign policy for a country like India is not a simple task because of diversities. It is either influenced by culture, religion or regional aspirations or the requirement of economic gains. Absorption of labour force is another big problem for India and thus its policy with a country must take into consideration these facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
179608
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Foreign policy of any nation state is decided by their objective which is broadly to pursue national security, economic growth and national interests which is decided by several factors interplaying at different levels and is devised by the Union government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
179598
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Contributions of states in India towards promoting and protecting external relations with India’s neighbours have been largely underplayed and the main focus has been to highlight the negative impact that it has been creating. Undoubtedly, state’s interference towards conducting of foreign relations can have both negative as well as positive impact given the demographic character on both sides of the border.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
179592
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The theme is topical. Intense debate has been generated on this issue since India back tracked from the signing of the Teesta water sharing agreement on account of objections from the government of west Bengal. This has definitely affected India Bangladesh relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
179593
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Evolution of Indian democracy has provided opportunities to widen the scope of states in foreign policy decision making. Interference by states in foreign policy should not be viewed as negative as quite often the central government has used it for successful negotiations. But the central government should have more powers to aggregate conflicting opinions, check undue interference and parochial interests to promote better relationship with foreign countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
179595
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the present day world, international relations are of paramount importance. If we look back, it becomes evident that after the treaty of Westphalia and the end of the First and Second World Wars, the international system has witnessed an increasing growth in the development of nation states. The end product of this development is thus, the creation of an interaction between these nation states. (Bojang, 2018).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
179603
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The regional dynamics of South Asia have been vitiated by the contentious issue of resource-sharing between and among its member-states since the dawn of decolonisation. Of the shared resources, the issue pertaining to water-sharing between India and Bangladesh festers till date, posing itself not only as a contentious factor between the two neighbouring states of South Asia, but also in the federal relations of the central government in India and the state government of West Bengal. The roots of the water-sharing dispute of the Teesta river can be traced back to the colonial policies, compounded by the absence of transparency and accountability of policy-makers and their lack of clear understanding of the dynamics of the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|