Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:867Hits:19990964Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BELTON, EMMA (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   179978


Evaluating Case-Managed Approaches to Counter Radicalization and Violent Extremism: an Example of the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM) Intervention / Cherney, Adrian; Belton, Emma   Journal Article
Cherney, Adrian Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In recent years there has been the proliferation of counterradicalization programs that incorporate a case management approach involving individually tailored intervention plans. The evaluation of case-managed countering violent extremism (CVE) interventions is challenging. This article provides results from research that evaluated a custody-based case-managed intervention delivered to convicted terrorists and individuals identified as at risk of radicalization in the Australian state of New South Wales, called the Proactive Integrated Support Model. A quantitative assessment of disengagement based on the coding of client case note data is provided. Results provide data on the background of clients, their intervention goals, and illustrate client change over time. Lessons for CVE evaluation and the role of formal interventions in facilitating disengagement are highlighted.
        Export Export
2
ID:   191034


Evaluation of case-managed programs targeting individuals at risk of radicalisation / Cherney, Adrian; Belton, Emma   Journal Article
Cherney, Adrian Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract There currently exists little evidence on the effectiveness of case-managed programs targeting radicalised individuals. This paper provides results from an evaluation of two case-managed interventions implemented by police in Australia, referred to as Intervention 1 and Intervention 2. Drawing on client case note data and interviews, the paper provides quantitative and qualitative results. It examines client change using a five-point metric and details two individual case studies. Results provide data on radicalised behaviours, intervention goals and services offered to clients. Individual client progress is explored, and the overall effectiveness of both programs examined. The results show a positive relationship between client change and different measures of engagement. Limitations of the evaluation methodology and data sources are acknowledged and addressed. Lessons are highlighted relating to the assessment of client change, program evaluation and the role of interventions in supporting disengagement.
        Export Export