Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:396Hits:19891312Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
FISCAL EXPENDITURE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   180119


Do energy subsidies reduce fiscal and household non-energy expenditures? a regional heterogeneity assessment on coal-to-gas prog / Wang, Qunwei   Journal Article
Wang, Qunwei Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In China, central, provincial, and prefecture-level governments have issued coal-to-gas subsidies to households since 2017, with the goal of encouraging the transition of residential heating energy from coal to natural gas. This study responds to the resulting public concerns that coal-to-gas subsidies reduce fiscal and household non-energy expenditures. To be specific, we measured the reductions in fiscal non-energy expenditures created by superior governmental subsidies (SGS) and local governmental subsidies (LGS). For households, we examined whether device subsidies (DS) and consumption subsidies (CS) encourage natural gas consumption, and thereby reduce household non-energy expenditures. A regional heterogeneity analysis was conducted to assess these subsidies. We found that reductions in fiscal and household non-energy expenditures mainly occur in cities with a higher proportion of natural gas in household energy consumption, and are induced by LGS and DS, respectively. SGS and CS are essential to remedy the fiscal and household reductions, respectively. Subsidies perform best in highly air-polluted cities, where CS encourage natural gas consumption without reducing household non-energy expenditures. This study recommends rearranging the coverage of coal-to-gas subsidies, transitioning to regionally differentiated subsidies and management according to city conditions.
        Export Export
2
ID:   182807


Removing the “Hats of Poverty: Effects of ending the national poverty county program on fiscal expenditures / Zhu, Jiong; Liu, Shouying; Li, Yihao   Journal Article
Liu, Shouying Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This paper investigates the effect of the cancellation of China's program of “national poverty counties”—a place-based policy—on county-level fiscal expenditures. Our difference-in-differences results indicate that the cancellation reduces the county fiscal expenditure-to-GDP ratio by an average of 3.78%. To support a causal interpretation of these findings, we provide two plausible explanations, the reverse flypaper effect and the active/passive waste effect. Our findings survive the consideration of selection bias, omitted-variable bias, and spatial correlation. Policy implications of our findings are also discussed.
        Export Export