Search Result

Srl

Item

ID: 182669

Contesting narratives of repression: experimental evidence from Sisi’s Egypt / Williamson, Scott; Malik, Mashail

Williamson, Scott	Journal Article
	0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)

Summary/Abstract

Authoritarian regimes frequently attempt to justify repression by accusing their opponents of violent behavior. Are such claims successful at persuading the public to accept state-sponsored violence, and can these claims be contested effectively by human rights organizations seeking to publicize evidence contradicting the regime’s narrative? To evaluate these questions, we conducted a survey experiment in Egypt using Facebook advertisements to recruit respondents safely. The experiment evaluates the persuasiveness of competing information provided by a human rights organization and the Egyptian security forces in shaping attitudes toward an incident of state-sponsored violence in which security forces killed several leaders of the opposition Muslim Brotherhood. We find evidence for the ability of Egyptian security forces to increase support for this repression when they control the narrative about why violence was used. However, we also find that the effects of this propaganda disappear when paired with information from Human Rights Watch that counters the security forces’ justifications. These findings provide experimental evidence that propaganda can help authoritarian regimes to increase public support for repression, but they also indicate that human rights organizations can play some role in mitigating this support when they succeed at disseminating countervalent information in these contexts.

Key Words

Human Rights ; Authoritarianism ; Middle East ; Repression ; Propaganda ; State Sponsored Violence

Links

'Full Text'

In Basket

Export

ID: 186867

Did Egypt’s post-uprising crime wave increase support for authoritarian rule? / Abadeer, Caroline; Blackman, Alexandra Domike ; Williamson, Scott

Williamson, Scott	Journal Article
	0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)

Summary/Abstract

Countries transitioning from autocracy to democracy often struggle to maintain law and order. Yet relatively little is known about how increasing crime rates impact public support for authoritarian leadership during a transition. We find an empirical relationship between rising crime and support for authoritarian leadership in Egypt following the 2011 uprisings. Analysis of original crime data from Egypt suggests that electoral districts exposed to larger year-on-year changes in localized patterns of crime were more likely to vote for the ‘strongman’ candidate in Egypt’s first, and only, free and fair presidential election in 2012. We also analyze survey data which shows that Egyptians who were highly concerned about crime were more likely to express support for a ‘strong leader’ as well as for military rule, even after controlling for a broad set of covariates. This research illustrates how instability triggered by political transitions can have negative implications for democratic consolidation.

Key Words

Authoritarianism ; Crime ; Egypt ; Democratization

Links

'Full Text'

In Basket

Export