| Summary/Abstract |
Histories and stories of Europe’s two “World” Wars are generally centered on narratives that privilege metropolitan empire perspectives over the perspectives of their satellite countries and their societies. As Spivak correctly observes, European and American academic writing is produced to support the economic interests of these countries. Similarly, knowledge or information is never innocent as it expresses the interests of its producers. It has invariably been in the interest of Eurocentric academic chroniclers of the Europe’s “World” Wars to write Africa’s contributions out of the dominant narratives of those wars. Just like European military regiments containing African soldiers and soldiers of African descent, who fought in Europe’s second “World” War and enabled Allied Powers’ victory over Nazi Germany and its Axis Powers allies, were “bleached” off every post-victory battle photographs of the War, the dominant narratives of the two “World” Wars are “bleached” to rid them of Africa’s economic contributions to the successful prosecution of both wars. This article represents an intervention to de-center such dominant albeit erroneous narratives on both wars. It brings focus on Africa’s economic contributions to the war efforts with the underscoring argument that but for Africa’s economic contributions, Africa’s European colonizers could not have achieved victory over Germany in both wars. The article advocates a de-centering agenda, which stems from postcolonial studies and theoretical framework as a useful tool for such corrective scholarship endeavor. The conclusive argument is that Africa’s economic contribution to the successful prosecution of Europe’s “World Wars” is primarily phenomenal rather than epiphenomenal.
|