Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1867Hits:21569379Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
ANDREAS BØJE FORSBY (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   183825


Inherently Particularistic? How China’s Identity Constrains its Ability to Wield Soft Power / Forsby, Andreas Bøje   Journal Article
Andreas Bøje Forsby Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Does China’s identity affect its attractiveness to the outside world? Although many China scholars seem to subscribe to this view, few have attempted to explore and theorise the relation directly. This article argues that to fully understand China’s (in)ability to wield soft power on the international stage, it is necessary to identify the underlying discursive structures, or building blocks, of China’s national identity. Based on an extensive reading of the secondary literature, the article singles out four relatively distinct discursive building blocks—“Sino-civilization”, “Confucianism”, the “Century of Humiliation” and the “Communist March”—each of which is critical to the articulation of Chinese identity in the 21st century. Following a description of these building blocks, this article shows, by examining a selection of public speeches by Xi Jinping, how the discursive building blocks have enabled and constrained the official narrative construction of China’s national identity. Against this backdrop, it is argued that China’s national identity is predominantly particularistic, or Sino-centric, and that this particularism places serious limitations on China’s soft power potential.
Key Words China  Soft Power 
        Export Export