| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
023556
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2003.
|
| Description |
31-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
018971
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Autumn 2000.
|
| Description |
45-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
110169
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
090470
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Military science has always tried to interpret war in terms of a philosophical category, identity the conditions and factors affecting it, and look into patterns and laws governing the origins, course, and outcome of war.
Going to the true causes of war and the most typical differences generating tensions in political and economic relation between countries culminating and manifesting in war between them in the principal challenge of this scientific search. A very important consideration here is to evaluate correctly the scope of influence that the potentialities of the warring countries, specific of the theaters of operation, and the opponents ' political aims have on he general character of future wars and their course and end results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
062577
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
183163
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
New technologies such as Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPVs) make it possible to remove human beings from direct involvement in combat. How will this evolving dynamic affect the practice and purposes of political violence? Will conflict become ‘costless’ in human terms as machines replace people on the front lines or will the logic of war continue to call for human sacrifice? While considerable attention has been devoted to the role of technology in transforming warfare, little is known about how new modes of combat will affect established motives for using force. I explore these political dimensions of new modes of conflict, drawing three basic conclusions. First, to the degree that substituting machines for humans lowers the costs for fighting, conflict will become more frequent, but less definitive. Second, in a reversal of previous trends, battlefield automation promises disproportionately to revitalise ground elements of military organisations. Finally, regrettably, new technologies should weaken inhibitions against targeting civilians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
083888
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
072294
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
124084
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article introduces political scientists to scenarios-future counterfactuals-and demonstrates their value in tandem with other methodologies and across a wide range of research questions. The authors describe best practices regarding the scenario method and argue that scenarios contribute to theory building and development, identifying new hypotheses, analyzing data-poor research topics, articulating "world views," setting new research agendas, avoiding cognitive biases, and teaching. The article also establishes the low rate at which scenarios are used in the international relations subfield and situates scenarios in the broader context of political science methods. The conclusion offers two detailed examples of the effective use of scenarios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
056127
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
072319
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
079206
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
012511
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March-April 1997.
|
| Description |
40-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
174702
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2018.
|
| Description |
xxii, 416p.: maphbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789386618412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059910 | 355.033054/KUM 059910 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
130152
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The character of 21st Century warfare is dominated by information warfare and long-range precision
strikes coupled with new forms of C4ISR. This is being achieved by linking intelligence together by a multiplicity of highly advanced sensors carried by high-altitude surveillance platforms, including HALE UAS, purpose-designed AEW&C aircraft, and space-based systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
104275
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
130026
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Like the United States and NATO, Russia is struggling to define the future security environment and shape a course to the creation of a relevant and effective military. Russia's strategic vision is of an uncertain, complex and quite dangerous word with threats ranging from internal subversion through intercontinental nuclear exchanges. The Russian military faces an impossible dilemma. It must address a broadening spectrum of prospective conflict scenarios with inadequate resources leading inevitably to the fielding of inadequate capabilities. One reason that Russia clings so tenaciously to nuclear weapons is its recognition that it is the nation's central, even the sole, source of political relevance and military power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
072295
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
187151
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Tensions between civil and military authorities over issues such as budgets and strategic posture are unavoidable in pluralistic societies. Scholars of Civil-Military Relations (CMR) have identified a range of practices through which civil-military contestation occurs, and examined their implications for issues such as military effectiveness. This literature, however, has yet to incorporate critical approaches to knowledge into its analysis. Seeking to fill this gap, this article explores how the British military's presentation of its professional knowledge has been increasingly shaped by the political context of British defence policy. More specifically, it argues that the British armed forces’ presentation of opaque imaginations of future war in military doctrine has sought to entrench the role of Defence in an environment of increasingly integrated governmental responses to security challenges. To do this, the article focuses specifically on two concepts that have become increasingly significant in the British defence establishment's articulation of its professional authority and strategic purpose – Multi-Domain Integration (MDI) and the Integrated Operating Concept (IOpC). The article therefore contributes to the literature a fresh perspective of the role of military doctrine and epistemic practices in civil-military contestation, as well as a critical account of the politics of knowledge in British defence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
001834
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 1997.
|
| Description |
xx,314p.
|
| Standard Number |
041516698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039197 | 355.02/GRA 039197 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|