Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:364Hits:19888094Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CLOSED AUTOCRACIES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   186684


Electoral Responsiveness in Closed Autocracies: Evidence from Petitions in the former German Democratic Republic / Lueders, Hans   Journal Article
LUEDERS, HANS Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Contested elections are usually seen as precondition for constituent responsiveness. By contrast, I show that even uncontested elections can create incentives for autocratic regimes to address citizen demands. I propose that closed autocracies engage in cycles of responsiveness before uncontested elections to assure citizens of their competence and raise popular support. They do so to mitigate the short-term destabilizing effects of elections. Analyzing a unique dataset of petitions to the government of the former German Democratic Republic (GDR), I calculate that response times to petitions were up to 31% shorter before the GDR’s uncontested elections. Moreover, I introduce the concept of “substantive responsiveness,” which focuses on the material consequences of responsiveness for petitioners, and show that petitions were 64% more likely to be successful. The paper advances our understanding of electoral mobilization in closed regimes and contributes to an emerging research agenda on responsiveness and accountability in autocracies.
        Export Export
2
ID:   185493


One Strike and You’re out…Dictators’ Fate in the Aftermath of Terrorism / Adam, Antonis; Tsavou, Evi   Journal Article
Adam, Antonis Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract We use a cross-country dataset on terrorism and leadership survival from 1970 through 2015 to shed light on a leader’s fate after terrorists’ strike. We provide robust evidence that incumbents in electoral authoritarian regimes face an increased hazard of exit from political power. This is contrasted with the closed authoritarian dictators that remain intact. Moreover, we fail to find a robust effect of terrorism on a leader’s survival probability in democracies. We conceive this effect to be due to the collapse of the elite coalition in autocracies after an attack, suggesting that the dictator’s ‘loyal friends’ betray him in the aftermath of terrorism.
        Export Export