Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1466Hits:19763415Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
ANTARAMIAN, RICHARD (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   186580


Confessionalism, Centralism, Armenians, and Ottoman Imperial Governance in the 18th and 19th Centuries / Antaramian, Richard   Journal Article
Antaramian, Richard Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article argues that non-Muslim engagement with 19th-century Ottoman reform should be understood in the context of a confessionalized politics that originally fostered partnerships of governance in the 18th century. The confessionalization of non-Muslim communities in the 18th century, which resulted in the political empowerment of Istanbul-based ethnarchs, promoted the establishment of robust communal boundaries that were more legible to the central state. These arrangements also made non-Muslim communities such as the Armenians partners in governance, responsible for supporting the state's effort to maintain its place atop a contentious imperial politics. The Tanzimat reforms, which reorganized non-Muslim communities and devolved some power from the clergy to the laity, were not a novelty, but instead a renegotiation of non-Muslims’ roles in the centralization of state. Rather than embrace secularized identities, non-Muslims enthusiastically used their own religious institutions to promote state centralization. In the process, they reconfigured relations of power in the region that left non-Muslims structurally marginalized.
Key Words Ottoman Empire  Armenians  Non-Muslims  Tanzimat  Confessionalism 
        Export Export