| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
193322
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
G20 played a crucial role until now in addressing the global financial crisis, the level of commitment towards tackling a wide range of current global issues remains uncertain. The G20’s rotating presidency system has resulted in numerous policy initiatives being introduced during leader’s summits, which often require subsequent presidencies to follow up on them. This approach does not provide adequate consistency, continuity, or peer pressure to ensure the implementation of relevant policy changes. As a result, the G20’s current format may be inadequate in delivering tangible outcomes for the issues at hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
193330
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India, at the G20 summit, has very certainly expressed its imaginative and prescient by using the idea that barring peace and security, our subsequent generations will no longer be in a position to take advantage fromfinancial boom and technological innovation. India is regarded as a world chief now. The promise of the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be referred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
188426
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Multilateralism at the regional and global stage is essential for Indonesia’s foreign policy. Apart from ASEAN, which has long been a pivotal array for Indonesia’s regional economic interdependence and political stability, the G20 is recently added to the country’s interest. It serves Indonesia’s desire for global leadership and middle-power status. As Indonesia began its year-long presidency of the G20 in 2022, the government is confident that hosting numerous meetings and the Group’s summit at the end of 2022 is a notable milestone for its international leadership exposure. This time, Indonesia’s President Joko Widodo emphasises priority agendas: strengthening global health architecture, transitioning to green and renewable energy, and promoting the digital economy. This commentary evaluates and projects Indonesia’s G20 presidency amidst the country’s democratic decline in recent years. It argues that Indonesia’s proposed agendas are more ambitious goals than strategic. Instead, the country’s priority will be marked by a solid neoliberal economic policy and stability, which is likely to cause even more democratic setbacks at home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|