|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
189647
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the conclusion, it won’t be wrong to say that the initiatives taken by China towards the middle east under Xi Jinping’s leadership will have big implications for the political and economic future of the region. The highlight which dominated the last month, is certainly the deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran, but what is highlighted more in the deal is the mediator. It is certainly a big geopolitical move the Chinese which will have defining results if the deal succeeds and brings long lasting peace to the conflict prone region. Adding to the anxieties of the United States, it also brings a new image of China with the caption - New International Peacemaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
189652
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Comparing both China and United States involvement in Africa one thing is clear that China is in better position than US in Africa. Over last twenty years Beijing has worked in the difficult environment of Africa and has created a better understanding with the fellow developing states. China has been able to suppress the US position in Africa.The recently held Africa Leaders’ summit by US was an initiative to catch up China. May be lately but US has realized the significance of Africa in the changing geopolitical landscape Indo-Pacific. As an economic player China has hugely invested in the infrastructure of Africa and has worked as main aid doner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
189649
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The trajectory is going to be filled with uncertainty as the US and China immerse in the tech battle. There is a bipartisan consensus in the US over the technological containment of China. The Chinese Communist Party and its leaders are also making tall claims of the ability to render these strategies useless. As this power struggle takes a techno-nationalistic turn, the tech giants will either have to quickly adapt or perish. There is no doubt that this chip war will have global ramifications as was witnessed in the chip supply shortages. The US is working with a clear aim to stop the rise of China in a post-pandemic global order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
189651
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The main reason behind the deterioration of relations was the technology war, which was launched by the Trump administration against China. At the centre of the U.S.-China stand-off was the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei, which was leading the world in the 5G telecommunications. This article provides a background to Huawei and identifies the reasons for its meteoric rise. It further looks at the decade long effort by the U.S. government to thwart Huawei’s attempts to enter the U.S. market. Lastly, it charts out the measures taken by both the Trump and Biden administrations in the U.S. to scuttle Huawei’s 5G deployment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
189643
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Indo-Pacific geopolitical discourse is still evolving and entering the post-INF era where the regional states may face dim prospects for arms control and potentially a fierce theatre-level, missile-led arms race. Gradually,the proliferation of missiles and missile defence systems is becoming the ‘new normal’ in the world. In particular, Indo-Pacific would be the intense theatre of missile deployment, transfer as well as employment and all these happening keeping in tandem with the evolution of geopolitical rivalry. It would be safe to predict that the demand for Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) technology will increase in the Indo-Pacific.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
189648
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Contrary, it can be analysed that NCW have varying degree of differences, firstly there is no clear cut bloc formation likewise of old cold war as primacy of national interests of countries like India, African and Latin American republics are intact, which are not taking the side of the US despite having close cooperation in many fields. Secondly, there is a Zeitenwende or turning point in new arms race globally. Recently Germany and Japan pledged to boost their defence spending to 2 per cent of its GDP and providing special funding to bolster the country’s defence. China is a primary push factor for the revival of arms race in the South Asia and South-East Asia. Recently, Philippines has signed a deal with BrahMos Aerospace Private Ltd. for the supply of shore-based BrahMos supersonic cruise missile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
189650
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Unfortunately for the United States and the rest of the world, weapons control will not be able to stop China’s aggressive counterspace actions. There are already deep and abiding disagreements universally about what constitutes weaponisation in space. As a result of all these discussions, a workable space weapons control system that can limit counterspace acts by any state, including China, is very far away, if it is even possible. Considering this, the US must make unilateral investments in creating the necessary countermeasures in order to get ready to deal with China’s counterspace initiatives. It should start a conversation with all spacefaring nations about the emerging dangers to space security, and it should definitely consult with its friends and allies, particularly in Asia—including, among others, Japan, South Korea, India, and Australia—about the difficulties presented by China’s counterspace programme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
189640
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In fact, the tension areas between the United States and that of China started rolling when the US President Joe Biden rounded off 2022 signing a defense spending bill including up to $10 billion (€9.4 billion) in assistance for Taiwan. We can find that the result is a series of cascade of measures from the part of the Biden administration and the US Congress. It is clearly aimed at supporting Taiwan, and at the same time a step to push back against China in all its motivations to get a control of the Taiwan. In view of all these, Taiwan is in a Sandwiched position. Shelley Rigger, who is a leading US authority on Taiwan, has expressed the opinion that Pelosi’s visit, really escalated the danger to a substantial quantum that Taiwan is facing without providing any concrete benefit to Taiwan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
189644
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Earlier known as Formosa, Taiwan is a tiny island off the east coast of China, separated from mainland China by the Taiwan Strait. It’s part of what’s called the “first island chain” -a string of islands nations/territories, including Japan, South Korea and Philippines that are seen as pro-US. The visit by US speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan is not being well received by China. It has sparked intense tensions between the two powerful countries- China and US as China sees Taiwan as a breakaway province. Taiwan, which considers itself a sovereign nation, has long been claimed by China, who considers Taiwan to be its breakaway province. Yet Taiwan also counts the US as its biggest ally, and Washington has a law that requires it to assist Taiwan in defending itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
189646
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Indo-Pacific region, comprising of some of the prominent economies in the global order today, has positioned itself as one of the epicenters of global politics in recent years. Although the concept of the construct dates back at least to the 1960s, it has assumed a renewed geo-political relevance ever since the emergence of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a possible rival to the western powers in general and the United States of America (USA)in particular, under the existing rules-based international order. From the strategic ‘pivot’ of the U.S. to policies aimed at the creation of regional groupings, the Indo-Pacific Theater remains an area of heightened tension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
189645
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The US presence and influence has created conducive environment for India’s penetration in the IPR. The US forging strategic partnership with India is the testimony of this fact as it has started viewing India as a counterweight to China. It appears that the partnership amongst various stakeholders such as India, US, Australia, and Japan in the IPR has the potential to moderate and deter China’s assertive behaviour there to a large extent. The US is employing dual-strategy viz-a-viz China-to practise the policy of hedging and improving trade and economic relations but at the same time maintaining the military preparedness and tactical posturing to check China’s military assertion in its immediate surroundings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
189653
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Middle East holds immense importance due to its natural resources and strategic location, making it a significant source of energy for both the United States and China. As such, the US-China rivalry in this region has major implications for regional stability, security, and global politics. The two countries have economic, strategic, and geopolitical interests in the region, including access to oil and gas resources, trade, and alliances with key actors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
189641
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The US China relations display a U-turn trajectory. During cold war, the US was hostile to the newly established Communist regime of China. However, the US policy took U-turn in early 1970s and courted communist China as a counterweight to its rival super power Soviet Union. In the post cold war era, The US and other western nations continued to facilitate China’s rise and integration in the global economy with the hope that it would eventually lead to democratization of Chinese regime and assimilation of China as a junior partner in the liberal global order. However, the US hopes were shattered as China displayed more centralization and authoritarianism domestically and aggressive approach in foreign affairs. This tendency has become more pronounced during the leadership of Xi Jinping since 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
189642
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The US China relations display a U-turn trajectory. During cold war, the US was hostile to the newly established Communist regime of China. However, the US policy took U-turn in early 1970s and courted communist China as a counterweight to its rival super power Soviet Union. In the post cold war era, The US and other western nations continued to facilitate China’s rise and integration in the global economy with the hope that it would eventually lead to democratization of Chinese regime and assimilation of China as a junior partner in the liberal global order. However, the US hopes were shattered as China displayed more centralization and authoritarianism domestically and aggressive approach in foreign affairs. This tendency has become more pronounced during the leadership of Xi Jinping since 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|